Search for: All records

Abstract. In 2020 the International Maritime Organization (IMO) implemented strict new regulations on the emissions of sulphate aerosol from the world's shipping fleet. This can be expected to lead to a reduction in aerosol-driven cooling, unmasking a portion of greenhouse gas warming. The magnitude of the effect is uncertain, however, due to the large remaining uncertainties in the climate response to aerosols. Here, we investigate this question using an 18-member ensemble of fully coupled climate simulations evenly sampling key modes of climate variability with the NCAR CESM2 model. We show that while there is a clear physical response of the climate system to the IMO regulations, including a surface temperature increase, we do not find global mean temperature influence that is significantly different from zero. The 20-year average global mean warming for 2020–2040 is +0.03 °C, with a 5–95 % confidence range of [-0.09, 0.19], reflecting the weakness of the perturbation relative to internal variability. We do, however, find a robust, non-zero regional temperature response in part of the North Atlantic. We also find that the maximum annual-mean ensemble-mean warming occurs around a decade after the perturbation in 2029, which means that the IMO regulations have likely had very limited influence on observed global warming to date. We further discuss our results in light of other, recent publications that have reached different conclusions. Overall, while the IMO regulations may contribute up to at 0.16 °C [-0.17, 0.52] to the global mean surface temperature in individual years during this decade, consistent with some early studies, such a response is unlikely to have been discernible above internal variability by the end of 2023 and is in fact consistent with zero throughout the 2020–2040 period. 

Abstract The regional climate impacts of anthropogenic aerosol emissions and irrigation growth in South Asia have conventionally been studied separately. These forcings have overlapping influences on surface temperature and atmospheric stability, but detection and attribution simulations typically quantify the impact of individual time‐evolving climate forcings, which does not account for nonlinear interactions between forcings or their impacts, when forcings evolve in tandem. Using transient simulations in GISS ModelE 2.1‐G, we assess the summertime surface energy balance in five different sub‐regions of South Asia by comparing the linear addition of anthropogenic aerosol and land use single‐forcing historical simulations with novel dual‐forcing simulations. We find that the combination of aerosol emissions and irrigation changes between preindustrial and present‐day increases aerosol hydration and cloud cover more strongly than does the linear addition of the individual forcings. This results in a strong nonlinear decrease in downwelling shortwave radiation, which drives subsequent nonlinearities in the surface energy balance through a relative suppression of energy availability at the surface. While aerosols and irrigation are each credited with suppressing monsoon winds and delaying onset, combined simulations of both forcings suggest that surface pressure is nonlinearly reduced over the northern Indian Subcontinent. This results in a net increase in 850 mb winds from the Bay of Bengal toward northwest India and Pakistan in combined simulations, suppressing the weakening of summer monsoon winds from single forcing results. The nonlinearities identified in our study suggest that the current framework for detection and attribution may not adequately account for potential interactions between forcings. 

Abstract The aerosol indirect effect (AIE) dominates uncertainty in total anthropogenic aerosol forcing in phase 6 of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) models. AIE strength depends on meteorological conditions that have been shown to change between preindustrial (PI) and present-day (PD) climates, such as cloud cover and atmospheric moisture. Hence, AIE strength may depend on background climate state, impacting the dependence of model-based AIE estimates on experiment design or the evolution of AIE strength with intensifying climate change, which has not previously been explicitly evaluated. Using atmosphere-only simulations with prescribed observed sea surface temperatures (SSTs) and sea ice in the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Community Earth System Model 2, version 2.1.3 (CESM2), Community Atmosphere Model, version 6.0 (CAM6), model, we impose a PD (2000) aerosol perturbation onto a PI (1850), PD, and PD with a uniform 4 K increase in the SST (PD + 4 K) background climate to assess the dependence of the total aerosol effective radiative forcing (ERF) and AIE on background climate. We find statistically insignificant increases in aerosol ERF when estimated in the different background climates, almost entirely from increases in direct ERF but with some regionally significant compensating signals in PD + 4 K. The absence of an AIE dependence on background climate in our PD simulation may be tied to documented differences in cloud responses to the observed SSTs used in our simulations versus SSTs produced by the fully coupled models from which most cloud feedback studies are derived, known as the “pattern effect.” Our findings indicate that AIE and aerosol forcing overall may not have a strong dependence on the background climate state in the near future but could regionally under extreme climate change. Significance StatementDiverse model representations of aerosol–cloud interactions strongly contribute to uncertainty in historical anthropogenic aerosol forcing and are associated with uncertainty in climate sensitivity. This study aims to highlight the dependence of aerosol indirect effects on the background climate state in Community Earth System Model 2, version 2.1.3 (CESM2), Community Atmosphere Model, version 6.0 (CAM6), by identifying microphysical and meteorological changes between aerosol-driven atmospheric responses in present-day and preindustrial climate states to understand anthropogenic aerosol-driven forcing more thoroughly. 

Abstract. In 2020, the International Maritime Organization (IMO) implemented strict new regulations on the emissions of sulfate aerosol from the world's shipping fleet. This can be expected to lead to a reduction in aerosol-driven cooling, unmasking a portion of greenhouse gas warming. The magnitude of the effect is uncertain, however, due to the large remaining uncertainties in the climate response to aerosols. Here, we investigate this question using an 18-member ensemble of fully coupled climate simulations evenly sampling key modes of climate variability with the NCAR model, the Community Earth System Model version 2 (CESM2). We show that, while there is a clear physical response of the climate system to the IMO regulations, including a surface temperature increase, we do not find global mean temperature influence that is significantly different from zero. The 20-year average global mean warming for 2020–2040 is +0.03 °C, with a 5 %–95 % confidence range of [-0.09,0.19], reflecting the weakness of the perturbation relative to internal variability. We do, however, find a robust, non-zero regional temperature response in part of the North Atlantic. We also find that the maximum annual mean and ensemble mean warming occurs around 1 decade after the perturbation in 2029, which means that the IMO regulations have likely had very limited influence on observed global warming to date. We further discuss our results in light of other, recent publications that have reached different conclusions. Overall, while the IMO regulations may contribute up to 0.16 °C [-0.17,0.52] to the global mean surface temperature in individual years during this decade, consistent with some early studies, such a response is unlikely to have been discernible above internal variability by the end of 2023 and is in fact consistent with zero throughout the 2020–2040 period. 

Aerosols markedly modify the social cost of anthropogenic emissions depending on where they are emitted. 

Abstract. Changes in anthropogenic aerosol emissions have strongly contributed to global and regional trends in temperature, precipitation, and other climate characteristics and have been one of the dominant drivers of decadal trends in Asian and African precipitation. These and other influences on regional climate from changes in aerosol emissions are expected to continue and potentially strengthen in the coming decades. However, a combination of large uncertainties in emission pathways, radiative forcing, and the dynamical response to forcing makes anthropogenic aerosol a key factor in the spread of near-term climate projections, particularly on regional scales, and therefore an important one to constrain. For example, in terms of future emission pathways, the uncertainty in future global aerosol and precursor gas emissions by 2050 is as large as the total increase in emissions since 1850. In terms of aerosol effective radiative forcing, which remains the largest source of uncertainty in future climate change projections, CMIP6 models span a factor of 5, from −0.3 to −1.5 W m−2. Both of these sources of uncertainty are exacerbated on regional scales. The Regional Aerosol Model Intercomparison Project (RAMIP) will deliver experiments designed to quantify the role of regional aerosol emissions changes in near-term projections. This is unlike any prior MIP, where the focus has been on changes in global emissions and/or very idealised aerosol experiments. Perturbing regional emissions makes RAMIP novel from a scientific standpoint and links the intended analyses more directly to mitigation and adaptation policy issues. From a science perspective, there is limited information on how realistic regional aerosol emissions impact local as well as remote climate conditions. Here, RAMIP will enable an evaluation of the full range of potential influences of realistic and regionally varied aerosol emission changes on near-future climate. From the policy perspective, RAMIP addresses the burning question of how local and remote decisions affecting emissions of aerosols influence climate change in any given region. Here, RAMIP will provide the information needed to make direct links between regional climate policies and regional climate change. RAMIP experiments are designed to explore sensitivities to aerosol type and location and provide improved constraints on uncertainties driven by aerosol radiative forcing and the dynamical response to aerosol changes. The core experiments will assess the effects of differences in future global and regional (Africa and the Middle East, East Asia, North America and Europe, and South Asia) aerosol emission trajectories through 2051, while optional experiments will test the nonlinear effects of varying emission locations and aerosol types along this future trajectory. All experiments are based on the shared socioeconomic pathways and are intended to be performed with 6th Climate Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP6) generation models, initialised from the CMIP6 historical experiments, to facilitate comparisons with existing projections. Requested outputs will enable the analysis of the role of aerosol in near-future changes in, for example, temperature and precipitation means and extremes, storms, and air quality. 

Abstract The distribution of anthropogenic aerosols’ climate effects depends on the geographic distribution of the aerosols themselves. Yet many scientific and policy discussions ignore the role of emission location when evaluating aerosols’ climate impacts. Here, we present new climate model results demonstrating divergent climate responses to a fixed amount and composition of aerosol—emulating China’s present-day emissions—emitted from 8 key geopolitical regions. The aerosols’ global-mean cooling effect is fourteen times greater when emitted from the highest impact emitting region (Western Europe) than from the lowest (India). Further, radiative forcing, a widely used climate response proxy, fails as an effective predictor of global-mean cooling for national-scale aerosol emissions in our simulations; global-mean forcing-to-cooling efficacy differs fivefold depending on emitting region. This suggests that climate accounting should differentiate between aerosols emitted from different countries and that aerosol emissions’ evolving geographic distribution will impact the global-scale magnitude and spatial distribution of climate change.